
|
Quote:
I would love to see how this is done. As I've said before, when I lost in civil court, my atty said I can't file in federal because you can't sue over a case that has already been decided. Can you be more specific? |
But who said you had to try to sue over the judgment results? There are many ways to do what you have been told you cannot do. It is the same with the idea that you can't sue yourself but that isn't necessarily true. You can sue yourself if you go about it the right way which is to have a means whereby the fact that you are actually suing yourself. The way that is done is to have a corporation which you control in some meaningful way sue you. If you own the corporation it is possible that the real victim of you having sued yourself can prove that is what you did. If you know someone who owns a corporation and knows how to get the job done and you have them do it for you then it is a piece of cake. The question is why would you do that? The answer is that doing so is doing the same thing firefighters do when fighting a big grass fire. They set a backfire, let it burn out the stuff the big fire would burn and when the big fire gets there it has no fuel so it goes out. If you sue yourself and get a big judgment and garnish 25% of your wages a judgment creditor can't get a thing! Your boss sends the 25% of your wages to the court who then sends it to the corporation you used to sue yourself and you get the money back. It isn't cheap to do that but it is much, much cheaper than losing your money to a judgment.
Now then back on topic. You can sue the judge in federal court if he somehow violates your due process rights. You can sue the lawyer who obtained the judgment if s/he violates your rights under FDCPA or FCRA in the process of getting the judgment or in trying to implement it through garnishment or other legal process and you can sue the 3rd party debt collector for any mistakes they might have made.
So your lawyer told you the truth but not all of the truth.
<< Home